MonitorCritic
public
Amazon Store
MSI MAG 325CQRXF E2 32
Recommended

MSI MAG 325CQRXF E2 32

Price unavailable Critic score 8.4/10

31.5" 2560 x 1440 px VA display

240Hz refresh rate with 0.5 ms response time

123% sRGB coverage for color-sensitive workflows

USB-C connectivity for single-cable setups

F EU energy label with 32W operating power

Find On Amazon open_in_new Compare This Model

Data sourced from the collected monitor spec CSV and local image library.

Overview Full Specs Pros & Cons Final Verdict Related Articles

Overview

MSI MAG 325CQRXF E2 32 pairs a 31.5" VA panel with 1440p output. The 240Hz refresh rate makes it a strong fit for responsive gaming and motion clarity. Brightness is listed at 300 nits, giving you a clearer picture of HDR and bright-room headroom. Color coverage reaches 123%, which helps gauge how well it can handle mixed work and play. USB-C connectivity adds flexibility for cleaner desk setups and modern laptop pairing.

insights

At a Glance

Panel
VA
Resolution
1440p
Refresh
240Hz
Response
0.5 ms
sRGB
123%
Brightness
300 nits

Full Specs

Screen Size
31.5"
Resolution
2560 x 1440 px
Display Type
VA, LCD, LED-backlit
Refresh Rate
240Hz
Response Time
0.5 ms
Adaptive Sync
AMD FreeSync Premium
Brightness
300 nits
Contrast Ratio
3500:1
sRGB Coverage
123%
Adobe RGB Coverage
92%
HDMI Ports
2
DisplayPort
1 (DP 1.4)
USB Ports
1
USB-C
Yes
Operating Power
32W
EU Energy Label
F
Release Date
09/19/2024

Expert Analysis: Pros & Cons

thumb_up

The Highs

  • check_circle Fast 240Hz refresh rate makes it well suited to competitive play.
  • check_circle Strong 123% sRGB coverage improves flexibility for content creation and general work.
  • check_circle USB-C support makes hybrid laptop and desktop setups easier to manage.
thumb_down

The Lows

  • cancel Price data is missing, so value positioning is harder to judge at a glance.

Final Verdict

MSI MAG 325CQRXF E2 32 stands out as a competitive gaming option with a VA panel, 1440p resolution, and a dataset-driven critic score of 8.4/10. It works best when you want a monitor whose core specs are strong and easy to compare against similar models in the archive.

8.4
Critic Score